People walk outside the BBC Broadcasting House in London. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters
A U.S. Judge has rejected the BBC’s application to stay discovery in the $10 billion lawsuit brought by U.S. President Donald Trump over its editing of a speech that made it appear he directed supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol, court documents showed on Thursday (February 12, 2026).
Solimo 2000/1000 Watts Room Heater
Adjustable thermostat • ISI certified • Ideal for small to medium rooms
📦 Featured Product Recommendation
Below is a top-recommended product you can buy on Amazon — support us by using the link below (we earn a commission at no extra cost to you).
🔗 Buy on Amazon* Shop with confidence — Amazon Affiliate Link
RR Signature WARMAXX Room Heater
Dual heating mode • Overheat protection • 5-level safety • 2 year warranty
View on AmazonBorosil 2000W Novus Electric Fan Heater
Made in India • Variable temperature • Horizontal & vertical placement
See Details on AmazonMr. Trump has accused Britain’s publicly owned broadcaster of defaming him by splicing together parts of a January 6, 2021, speech, including one section where he told supporters to march on the Capitol and another where he said “fight like hell”.
It omitted a lengthy section in which he called for peaceful protest.
Mr. Trump’s lawsuit alleges the BBC defamed him and violated a Florida law that bars deceptive and unfair trade practices. He is seeking at least $5 billion in damages for each of the lawsuit’s two counts.
U.S. District Judge Roy Altman on Wednesday (February 11, 2026) denied the British broadcaster’s application to stay the merits-based discovery phase, when both sides can obtain evidence from other parties in the lawsuit, the documents showed.
The Judge said the BBC’s application was premature nor had it shown that it would be prejudiced if the stay was not granted. In a separate order, the Judge set a two-week trial date for February 2027.
The BBC declined to comment.
The broadcaster has previously said it would defend the case and would seek to have the case dismissed, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction because it did not broadcast the programme in Florida, and that the president could not prove damages because he was re-elected after it aired.
Published – February 12, 2026 08:02 pm IST
